The WSJ Latest Attack on Hillary: Biden is 'Likely to Run' According to Unamed 'Insiders'

As I said in an earlier piece, while Bernie supporters beat their beasts over a single Super PAC attack against St. Bernie he has gotten a total free ride from the press next to it's relentless three pronged attack on Hillary over

1. Her emails.

2. Endless speculation about whether or not Biden is running

3. Grabbing onto and belaboring any poll that can possibly be spun as Bernie rising or her falling off. They have framed very piece of polling as 'Bad news for Hillary Clinton, shes only leading 20 points nationally after leading by 40 in July.'

Of course, if you take Biden out of these polls her lead goes back to 30.

http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/09/bernie-fans-want-to-exploit-emailgate.html

Speaking of Biden there;s a new breathless piece in the Wall Street Journal today that Biden is 'More likely than not to run'-kind of recalls the Ted Wells investigation of Tom Brady' More likely than not-which of course was thrown out of an actual court of law.

UPDATE: The WSJ is linked in full to Huffington Post which after having the anti Hillary pro Bernie piece I linked to just above, has another pro Sanders piece today.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-faux/bernie-sanders-a-moment-o_b_8163092.html

Two pro Bernie anti Hillary pieces in two days for Huff Po. I've never see the reverse there.

Remember, every time the media breathes the word Biden it's an attack on Hillary. What's ironic is that in 2011 during the President's re-election, Biden's name was used as an attack on Obama.

http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/09/remember-when-media-wanted-obama-to.html

The only stories the media covers on Hillary during this campaign are 1-3. To just mention any one of them is by definition an attack on her.

Here comes the WSJ to kick her again.

"Vice President Joe Biden’s aides in recent days called Democratic donors and supporters to suggest he is more likely than not to enter the 2016 race, and their discussions have shifted toward the timing of an announcement, said people familiar with the matter."

"While the Biden team is still debating the best time to jump in, the vice president met Monday with his political advisers and talked about the merits of an early entry that would assure him a place in the Democratic debate scheduled for Oct. 13. They also are honing his campaign message and moving ahead with plans to raise money and hire staff, the people said."

http://www.wsj.com/articles/joe-biden-edges-closer-to-joining-presidential-race-1442617215?cb=logged0.5427677240222692

I mean there's no way to disprove this-or prove it for that matter, which doesn't stop the entire press corps from running with this story. 

All I know is that the claim that they are focusing on getting into the first debate is diametrically opposed to what a Politico piece said yesterday. There it sounded like the Bernie folks think they have all the time in the world to get in-maybe even waiting until April. 

The overall strategy seemed to be that he would wait for her to fall then get in. 

http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/09/does-biden-plan-to-play-footsie-with.html

Have they now decided overnight that she's fallen enough?

Nice attitude by Biden if true that he's waiting to see the President's presumptive successor for his agenda fall on her fact so he can capitalize. 

I get it that Joe has suffered and my heart goes out to him but could he maybe think of the party and the country a little too rather than milking this perpetually?

If he were to stop this it would rob the media of one of their three weapons against Hillary. 

This country can not afford another Bush-and don't get it twisted: the GOP insiders and media may be crooning worshipful odes to Carly now but just as a Trojan Horse to save Jeb. There is determination to destroy Trump that is pretty selective. 

http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-lies-of-carly-fiorina_18.html