It couldn't have been more stark than the time Hillary came on. In that interview, Andrea Mitchell did everything but pull out her fingernails in firing off email after email question and demanding an apology-for what nobody knows, exactly.
http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/09/after-watching-andrea-mitchell-drill.html?showComment=1441552913247#c4090473241607664684
Bernie's interview couldn't have been more different. The two talked as old friends. Rachel didn't ash him a single negative or skeptical question.
She did wonder if Elizabeth Warren will campaign with him.
A saint campaigning with another saint.
I guess this is because Bernie is perfect. He has no issues worth questioning him on. He has no flaws of policy or character. Like the Bernie Maniacs piously preach He's the true progressive.
No questions as to why he didn't support the Brady bill or the 2007 immigration reform bill. No question as to why if the GOP is as appalling as he rightly tweeted the other night, Democrats should waste so much time arguing over who the true progressive is.
Why not coalesce around Hillary who has the backing of most in the party-outside of some white liberals in NH and Iowa?
The trouble with the Bernie Maniacs is that you can't reason with Emoprogs who can't stand for cold-blooded left brain logic of tactics and party.
In their mind all that matters is idoelogical purity and they're sure Bernie has it.
No question on what a democratic socialist is? Is it very different from a Democrat? Then why run as a Democrat? Is it not much different? Then why not run as a Democrat?
Are these questions out of bounds but interrogating Hillary over her legal actions weren't?
If her viewers actually mattered to her, maybe Rachel could explain this to us.
http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/09/after-watching-andrea-mitchell-drill.html?showComment=1441552913247#c4090473241607664684
Bernie's interview couldn't have been more different. The two talked as old friends. Rachel didn't ash him a single negative or skeptical question.
She did wonder if Elizabeth Warren will campaign with him.
A saint campaigning with another saint.
I guess this is because Bernie is perfect. He has no issues worth questioning him on. He has no flaws of policy or character. Like the Bernie Maniacs piously preach He's the true progressive.
No questions as to why he didn't support the Brady bill or the 2007 immigration reform bill. No question as to why if the GOP is as appalling as he rightly tweeted the other night, Democrats should waste so much time arguing over who the true progressive is.
Why not coalesce around Hillary who has the backing of most in the party-outside of some white liberals in NH and Iowa?
The trouble with the Bernie Maniacs is that you can't reason with Emoprogs who can't stand for cold-blooded left brain logic of tactics and party.
In their mind all that matters is idoelogical purity and they're sure Bernie has it.
No question on what a democratic socialist is? Is it very different from a Democrat? Then why run as a Democrat? Is it not much different? Then why not run as a Democrat?
Are these questions out of bounds but interrogating Hillary over her legal actions weren't?
If her viewers actually mattered to her, maybe Rachel could explain this to us.
No comments:
Post a Comment