Pages

Monday, November 9, 2015

Why Hillary Clinton is the Right Choice for Labor Unions

A new National Journal piece suggests that HRC has her work cut out for her with the unions.

"I was in north­east Ohio on a mis­sion to find out how or­gan­ized labor is feel­ing these days about Hil­lary Clin­ton. Sev­en years ago, Clin­ton cap­tured a ma­jor­ity of uni­on house­holds in Ohio, en route to a 10-point primary vic­tory against Barack Obama. In Lo­rain County, her mar­gin was even more re­sound­ing: 57-to-41."

"At this fun­draiser, however, skep­ti­cism to­ward Clin­ton was def­in­itely in the air. Of the nine uni­on mem­bers I in­ter­viewed, just one was sup­port­ing her. (Four were un­de­cided, three were back­ing Bernie Sanders, and one was lean­ing to­ward Marco Ru­bio.) Some as­so­ci­ated her with the un­pop­u­lar trade policies of her hus­band. Oth­ers said she had been tain­ted by con­tro­versy, past and present. Most ques­tioned her com­mit­ment to labor."

http://www.nationaljournal.com/s/92139/does-labor-actually-like-hillary-clinton

Marco Rubio?! This is the guy whose tax proposals are crazier than what Ben Carson thinks of the pyramids. I think this is a great line but I have to admit it's Paul Waldman's.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/11/09/happy-hour-roundup-730/

http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/11/marco-rubios-comic-book-version-of-tax.html

So we have to ascribe in part the tepid feeling of many rank and file union members to lack of information. Its' one thing to say they think Bernie is better for labor-though I don't know how bringing back Glass-Steagall brings back factories to so many of the small towns that lost them in over 30 years-but Rubio?!

There are, of course, lots of real problems. The pain of so many cities, towns, and regions who have seen industry leave starting in the 80s and 90s.

"Mary Sprin­gowski, Tom’s wife and a UAW mem­ber who voted for John Ed­wards in 2008, called Clin­ton a “Pre­tend-o-crat.” “These politi­cians don’t rep­res­ent labor any­more,” she said. “I’m liv­ing in a city that is dy­ing, and they don’t care.”

"Tom Sprin­gowski, who voted for Obama in the 2008 primary, wanted to show me why people felt this way. So we piled in­to his 1998 Ford Taur­us and rumbled in­to down­town Lo­rain. Though it was a Sat­urday night, we spot­ted only a hand­ful of rev­el­ers: smokers puff­ing out­side the Palace Theat­er, killing time be­fore an Arlo Gu­thrie show. We drove down the main drag, past Boot­leg­ger’s Den (a biker bar), Midtown Bail Bonds (whose neon sign de­pic­ted the Mono­poly man in jail garb), and the Glass House (a head shop ad­vert­ising a bong shaped like Fe­lix the Cat). Sprin­gowski poin­ted out a post of­fice that had been re­made in­to a store prom­ising “Cash for Gold.” Later, we passed a shuttered gypsum plant where Obama had prom­ised to spur man­u­fac­tur­ing in 2008. Listen­ing to the pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates today, “I don’t hear of any at­tempt to try and bring in­dustry back in­to this coun­try,” Tom told me. “There’s no plan."

However, unfortunately too much of the labor movement seems to be wholly focused on political symbolism.

"In re­cent weeks, Clin­ton has seemed to sense that she has work to do vis-à-vis or­gan­ized labor. Not only has she come out against TPP, but, just be­fore I ar­rived in Ohio, she also en­dorsed re­peal of the Ca­dillac tax. The ques­tion is wheth­er these moves can over­come the baseline skep­ti­cism that I heard from many uni­on mem­bers—es­pe­cially in Ohio—and re­solve what ap­pears to be a split opin­ion about her with­in the world of or­gan­ized labor. “She’s gotta con­vince people, par­tic­u­larly work­ers, that she means what she says and she says what she means. And that’s her chal­lenge, I think,” says AFL-CIO pres­id­ent Richard Trumka. “I think as her po­s­i­tions have cla­ri­fied, she’s demon­strated, I think, more and more, that she’s on the right side of the ledger with the is­sues. … In the past, she ac­ted like she wanted our vote. Now she’s ac­tu­ally act­ing like she wants our sup­port. Ma­jor dif­fer­ence. Ma­jor dif­fer­ence. And she needs our sup­port—the sup­port of work­ing people—to win.”

I think this is the whole problem. The unions want to see that she really supports them but how do they judge loyalty? Opposition to TPP and repeal of the 'Cadillac tax' neither of which will do much to bring back the kind of factory jobs the unions look back on.

The old factories aren't coming back to these towns and localities because the economy has changed in some very stark ways over the last 20 years.

Hillary actually has some real solutions and these have nothing to do with repeal of the CT-which is mostly a GOP gripe and repeal of it might be a pretty bad idea-and or scorched earth opposition to all trade deals.

She understands that the problem is modernizing regulations and labor laws in what you might call the new Uber Economy.

http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/07/hillary-on-uber-economy.html

But how much scope do you have to educate union members in the middle of a fraught campaign? I think what this does mean is she should frame her Uber Economy agenda as being the real solution to the loss of decent paying jobs.

One can't help but think that this angst of American workers is related to the strange new finding that there is a rise in mortality rates of the white working class.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/09/opinion/despair-american-style.html

Hillary wisely mentioned this specific phenomenon-the rise of mortality for poorer whites in her meeting with Rachel Maddow last Friday.

But she has the right answers for labor but just has to make sure she frames it optimally for them to get it.

No comments:

Post a Comment