Pages

Friday, October 9, 2015

Tom Brown Asks What About the Democrats?

Which is a good question.

"Democrats are masochists too though Mike. They don't go out to vote when there isn't a shiny object to keep their attention focused, and the result is the largest Republican majority in the House in many decades. If fucking Democrats would vote instead of whatever the fuck else they're doing on election day, this political cancer called the GOP (beholden to a core of angry hot-headed delusional zealots) wouldn't be nearly so toxic as it is."

http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-republican-party-is-no-longer-party.html?showComment=1444437543661#c4439213981885196770

Here was my immediate response to Tom:

"Oh don't get me wrong. There are definitely some self defeating attitudes and actions on the part of the Democratic party. My point here is not to deny the Dems mismanage things a lot.  A big problem with the Democratic party are the large number of 'Emoprogs' who can be sort of like the Tea Party extremists in letting the perfect being the enemy of the good. "

"There has often been a problem with progressive activists that they are too single issue rather than strategic. They tend to care only about their pet issues rather than the Democratic party. Agreed. But they are still a party even one that makes some very boneheaded moves sometimes. "

"Look what's pathetic is that the Dems have played the GOP to a 1-1 tie for 48 years when the public clearly agrees with us ideologically. On the New Deal, etc"

In my last post I pointed out that the modern GOP which I date back to the rise of the New Deal is Nixonian. This means their only real interest is being part of the scorched earth opposition for New Deal liberal Democrats, not of providing any kind of a meaningful positive vision for the country. 

http://diaryofarepublicanhaterblogspotcom.sharedby.co/share/q5FmjV

But a party needs to be for something not just against something. But the party has just gotten more and more purist and ideological through the years-because of the insecurity of knowing they are on the wrong dies of the issues with the American people. 

On some level they realize they can't win on issues. 

But the party gets more and more purist and unwilling to compromise even within the party, even within the House GOP. 

I'd say that purity is always an Original Sin. You have some versions of this in the Democratic party or among the base at times. 

There are some Emoprogs that sound like they'd rather be right than President. Most of these folks are for Bernie this time around, they hated Obama once he got into office-maybe they liked him during his 2008 'Yes we can' stage. and they supported Nader in 2000 who cares if it gives us W?

Purity-letting the perfect be the enemy of the good is always the problem. It's what the Far Left and Far Right as opposed to the sensible center have in common. 

I would say that to an extent we have a problem with voter suppression in certain Republican dominated states. 

But I don't get why so many Democratic voters need to be warmed up to be enthused for the next election. Part of it is that the conservative groups have done a much better job than the liberal groups in the past firing up the base. 

I think at least now there is some awareness from the party that this is a problem. 

No matter what, purity is a problem as it strikes against building a consensus. To have unity we have to be willing to play up our areas of agreement and minimize our disagreements. Without this we can't get anything done. 

By this definition the Dems have had these problems in the past from time to time. But they are a party if a party that's not always efficient and smart in its tactics. 

A really annoying aspect of Emoprogs is how they turn up their virgin noses at the very idea that there is a tactical, strategic side to politics even if on policy we are on the side of angels or at least closer to them. 

The GOP though now looks like it's going to struggle to even find the most basic unity in the future if they can't agree on a Speaker. 

The Democrats may not always be such a bright party but the GOP is ceasing to be a party 

22 comments:

  1. I agree with you about purity. To me "purity" is a dirty word. One of the dirtiest. Lol. Historically, purity has frequently lead to the worst human behavior imaginable.

    "Part of it is that the conservative groups have done a much better job than the liberal groups in the past firing up the base."

    Agreed. Even now, it's easy to see why a Trump can so easily get the mouth-breathers beating their war drums with gusto.

    Thinking about what would get me fired up (it definitely wouldn't fit on a bumper sticker).... I realize would leave most people cold, or even hostile. Even with people who would mostly agree with me. Actually, maybe I could fit it on a bumper sticker: "Purity" with a red line through it. Or how about "Purity is garbage." Nice and ironic. Or perhaps "Faith is a not a virtue. It's just an unreliable way to know things." Nope... definitely don't put me in charge of creating any campaign slogans.

    "I would say that to an extent we have a problem with voter suppression in certain Republican dominated states."

    Agreed. But still... this post was disheartening to read:
    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-house-republicans-did-even-better-than-they-expected/

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think me and you could start a party though how many would join is the problem. Basically I read you to e kind of Whig-as I am at bottom.

    The liberal Democrat party post FDR is the whig party today.

    The slogan I hate the most is the Emoprogs who uses to piously declare 'The lesser of evils is still evil.'

    This is basically a recipe for totalitarianism. Much like the Freedom Caucus demand that the entire 247 GOP caucus has to vote yes for the next Soeaker

    ReplyDelete
  3. I mean to declare we can do nothing without unanimous agreement? What is more the definition of tyranny that this?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Republicans' have a distinct advantage over the Dem's in that they hold some very serious gerrymandered districts and a batshit crazy base that votes in those districts. This does not absolve the Dem's of there inability to point out the obvious, Charlie Pierce argues that the Dem's should be playing this obvious fact for maximum effect at election time. Robert Farley at LGM has a counter narrative. Not sure what can be done on the Dem side of the ledger. Cleaning house at the DNC would be a good place to start. Here's a link if you're so inclined: http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2015/10/im-sure-that-yelling-louder-will-work

    ReplyDelete
  5. TK Nanute! Now Greg from Georgia needs to check in. Where are you Greg? I haven't hurt from you since I renamed my blog

    ReplyDelete
  6. To me they Dems can just sit back and enjoy the clown show. Despite gerrymandering some political scientists like Sean Trende thinks Boehner's resignation puts the House possibly in play in 2016.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/29/why_the_gop_may_regret_losing_boehner.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nanute, I agree, and thanks for the link. But when turnout is down 45% on non-Presidential election years (see my link above), do you think those are passionate gun nuts or Rush listeners staying home? Mostly not I'd say.

    Mike I'm right there with you on the Whig party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom, Point taken. The question is why do we Dem's stay home? Just a guess on my part: I think it is party because a lot of liberal/progressives feel marginalized and disaffected by the national party. Secondly, some of the candidates that get nominated and supported by the national party are abysmal. And the candidates that are any good, with a few exceptions, don't get support from the national structure. Start with restructuring the DNC as noted above. (And Mike is a shill for asking us to make Amazon purchases through his site!) lol. To be fair, he did buy me lunch yesterday at Popeye's.

      Delete
    2. I solemnly vow to stop shilling as soon as one of my Esteemed Readers buys something.

      Yes, you in particular are ahead anyway after lunch yesterday!

      Delete
    3. "To be fair, he did buy me lunch yesterday at Popeye's." ... any gun play involved? If so did you direct the gunman to the clerk, or did you and Mike "rush him" like any self-respecting Jews would clearly have done (to put the kabash on the Holocaust circa 1938) had they not been tragically brainwashed with leftist political correctness (as they clearly were: there's no other explanation)?

      Delete
    4. Regarding inspiration to vote: For me what works is to convince me with a modicum of evidence that you're not delusional or insane or won't contribute to the insanity or delusions (like what's going on in the other party), and I'll automatically be fired up to vote for you in the General.

      Delete
    5. Yes, Ben Carson's story about when he told the guy with the gun he wants the other guy did come up while we were eating.

      Delete
    6. You've made the essential case for Hillary Clinton Tom. She's not the least bit delusional or insane, and has some of the best experience you could want-her time at Secretary of State in and of itself provides all the experience you would need to run the country.

      Unfortunately not all are like you to say the least. Some want to believe that a candidate is basically Jimmy Smith before they give up their vote which they see as such a sacrifice to even give.

      In their mind they're normal life of beer and Starbucks is something holy that only the running of a Saint like Elizabeth Warren or Bernie could ever make them leave for a couple of minutes on election day to vote on the direction of their country.

      Before voting they want to be sure the candidate is literally the most progressive person to ever run for office anywhere, ever.

      Delete
    7. I mean Jimmy Smith Goes to Washington. President Obama kind of ran as Jimmy in 2008-'Yes We Can' but once they realized he was just a decent man and politician doing his best for the country and not a St. they cursed him to the Heavens.

      Delete
    8. Tom, lol. Mike said, "let's rush him." I said, " go ahead, I be right behind you." (Mike's a big boy.) Sorry to digress here, Mike. We did have a good laugh or two yesterday, didn't we. I saw something on twitter earlier about Carson's spokesperson blaming the Jews for the Holocaust. Commenter said something like this: German to the Jew: get on ze train. Jew: not a good idea, I have a gun. WWII ends.

      Delete
    9. Yes II heard about Carson's own Final Solution. If only Germany had a functioning NRA at the time so much could have been avoided.

      Delete
  8. By the way Tom I guess I'll have to give this request to you here as I can't tell you in person like with Nanute-as we both live in NY. Don't no when I'm going to Callie next, LOL.

    Assuming the idea ever crosses your mind 'I sure love Mike's voluminous blogging and sure do wish I could donate to him in some way' the good news is you don't even have to make a donation.

    Here's what you can do. If you ever buy anything on Amazon just make your purchase on the Amazon links at my site.

    You help me and it's not even a donation as its a purchase you would make anyway. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  9. My answer is a bit different than Nanute's. A thought of mine is that certain 'Emoprogs' are too picky and let the perfect the enemy of the good.

    Some-not Nanute of course-are waiting for Marx himself to run before they deem to actually vote.

    On either Left or Right I read the big problem as letting the Perfect be the enemy of the Good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "letting the Perfect be the enemy of the Good" ... I agree. I think this ties into Noah Smith's semi-recent post on Whigs vs Haan.

      Delete
  10. In Maine this vaunted fastidiousness led Emoprogs to run a third party candidate twice which enabled Paul Lapage two terms even though he's wildelyconsidered the worst GOP Governor in the nation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paul Fucking LePage? Charlie Pierce refers to him as the human bowling jacket.

      Delete