We are always hearing how pious Bernie is how he doesn't have a Super PAC and doesn't go negative.
Well the answer to this is that for most of the campaign he's had a free ride and so hasn't needed either.
Hillary has 100 different conservative Super PACS trained at her and so she needs to be able to fight back. For instance, Citizen's United, Judicial Watch and other such groups have rained down frivolous FOIA requests tying up 28 different courts and requiring the State Department, the FBI, etc, to weigh in on them.
We always hear that Bernie does no negative attacks. So it's very interesting reading this.
"Tuesday's debate is the Democratic Super Bowl. We know the home team. We know the visitors. The issues have always been political footballs and only one candidate hasn't turned them over to the Republicans. This election will also see the emergence of additional players like the FBI and other intelligence agencies (investigating Clinton's emails, not Hillary Clinton), so the playing field is full of participants, but only one true leader."
"It's difficult to say "trust me" when the FBI and other intelligence agencies don't trust your ability to type an email."
"There's a reason CBS News writes that within the Democratic Party, "Fourteen percent would not support her in a general election." There's also a reason that according to a recent Reuters article titled Clinton's support slides ahead of first Democratic debate, polls have changed dramatically in a matter of days"
"Polling trajectory (combined with Clinton's negative trustworthiness and favorability ratings ) as well Bernie's increased name recognition from the debates, will eventually enable Sanders to overtake Clinton in a number of polls."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/why-bernie-sanders-has-already-won-the-democratic-debates_b_8278834.html
So does this sound negative to you? Now maybe you dismiss it-ok so this is what a Bernie Maniac is saying you can't blame Bernie.
Well, I still find it shocking that a Bernie supporter would write something like this in Huff Po-which is becoming the propaganda organ of the Sanders' campaign.
But here' s what's even more shocking. The Bernie Sanders' campaign just linked to this article at the top of its Twitter page.
Well the answer to this is that for most of the campaign he's had a free ride and so hasn't needed either.
Hillary has 100 different conservative Super PACS trained at her and so she needs to be able to fight back. For instance, Citizen's United, Judicial Watch and other such groups have rained down frivolous FOIA requests tying up 28 different courts and requiring the State Department, the FBI, etc, to weigh in on them.
We always hear that Bernie does no negative attacks. So it's very interesting reading this.
"Tuesday's debate is the Democratic Super Bowl. We know the home team. We know the visitors. The issues have always been political footballs and only one candidate hasn't turned them over to the Republicans. This election will also see the emergence of additional players like the FBI and other intelligence agencies (investigating Clinton's emails, not Hillary Clinton), so the playing field is full of participants, but only one true leader."
"It's difficult to say "trust me" when the FBI and other intelligence agencies don't trust your ability to type an email."
"There's a reason CBS News writes that within the Democratic Party, "Fourteen percent would not support her in a general election." There's also a reason that according to a recent Reuters article titled Clinton's support slides ahead of first Democratic debate, polls have changed dramatically in a matter of days"
"Polling trajectory (combined with Clinton's negative trustworthiness and favorability ratings ) as well Bernie's increased name recognition from the debates, will eventually enable Sanders to overtake Clinton in a number of polls."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/why-bernie-sanders-has-already-won-the-democratic-debates_b_8278834.html
So does this sound negative to you? Now maybe you dismiss it-ok so this is what a Bernie Maniac is saying you can't blame Bernie.
Well, I still find it shocking that a Bernie supporter would write something like this in Huff Po-which is becoming the propaganda organ of the Sanders' campaign.
But here' s what's even more shocking. The Bernie Sanders' campaign just linked to this article at the top of its Twitter page.
Here is another piece by this same author also at Huff Po. Is there any doubt that Huffington Post wold never print such drek if directed at Sanders?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/benghazi-is-political-but-clintons-email-scandal-is-serious_b_8255482.html
So just as the partisan nature of Benghazi is being shown Bernie supporters-and his campaign on Twitter-are embracing it?
Maybe next time Chris Hayes or Rachel Maddow has Bernie on they can ask him about this.
No comments:
Post a Comment