The media has basically taken upon itself the role as her primary opponent and anything and everything is framed in as negative terms as possible for her. To hear the tone and framing of the media narrative is to believe that she's about to suffer an Obama 2.0.
In fact nothing is further from the truth as Bernie Sanders is no President Obama, not in a million years.
http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/09/i-kick-hornets-nest-of-bernie-maniacs.html
Bernie actually leads in just NH and if anyone has a ceiling it's less Trump in the GOP-we really don't know what his ceiling is yet; we keep hearing he's hit it, then he sees his numbers go up-its' Bernie Sanders who has white liberals in states like NH and Iowa and that's about it.
Yet, the media frames it as big trouble that Hillary is only up 11 over him in Iowa.
Meanwhile they are now touting a new poll that shows her losing to Trump by 5 points. My reaction to that is 'Sure! He will beat her by 5 points if he gets every white vote in the country.' Yet this poll claims he gets large chunks of the Latino and African-American votes.
When I saw that, I realized that this poll is absolutely worthless-because no way in hell is he going to get these kinds of numbers from blacks and Latinos-Gallup shows his unfavorability among Latinos as 77%. So these poll numbers are simply science fiction.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/184814/hispanics-frown-trump-not-rest-gop-field.aspx
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-08-24/trump-s-net-favorable-rating-among-hispanics-at-51-gallup
Yet we;re supposed to believe Trump is getting a third of Latino voters against Hillary and more from blacks-who haven't gone beneath 80% for the Dems since the rise of the Southern strategy.
"Whoa! SurveyUSA has just come in with a national poll, conducted Sept. 2-3, showing Donald Trump leading Hillary Clinton 45 to 40 percent. Clearly even as Clinton's unfavorables are going up, Trump's are going down. The top line is not far out of line with national polls conducted between Aug. 11 and Aug. 30, which showed Trump with 41 to 45 percent and Clinton with 45 to 51 percent, but it is the first national poll showing Trump leading Clinton. But the biggest news in the SurveyUSA poll is its results for the "non-white" or "people of color" bloc that, in some psephologists' analyses, is fated to make the Democrats a permanent majority party"
"Against Trump Clinton carries non-whites — but by less than impressive margins. Trump's name is supposed to be mud among Hispanics, but he gets 31 percent of their votes — more than Mitt Romney in 2012, the same as John McCain in 2008 — and Clinton gets only a bare 50 percent. Among Asians, Trump actually has a (statistically insignificant) lead of 41 to 39 percent, echoing the 50 to 49 percent Asian margin for Republicans in the 2014 vote for House of Representatives. And among blacks Clinton leads Trump by 59 to 25 percent. That's a huge contrast with Barack Obama's margins of 95 to 4 percent in 2008 and 93 to 6 percent in 2012."
In fact nothing is further from the truth as Bernie Sanders is no President Obama, not in a million years.
http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/09/i-kick-hornets-nest-of-bernie-maniacs.html
Bernie actually leads in just NH and if anyone has a ceiling it's less Trump in the GOP-we really don't know what his ceiling is yet; we keep hearing he's hit it, then he sees his numbers go up-its' Bernie Sanders who has white liberals in states like NH and Iowa and that's about it.
Yet, the media frames it as big trouble that Hillary is only up 11 over him in Iowa.
Meanwhile they are now touting a new poll that shows her losing to Trump by 5 points. My reaction to that is 'Sure! He will beat her by 5 points if he gets every white vote in the country.' Yet this poll claims he gets large chunks of the Latino and African-American votes.
When I saw that, I realized that this poll is absolutely worthless-because no way in hell is he going to get these kinds of numbers from blacks and Latinos-Gallup shows his unfavorability among Latinos as 77%. So these poll numbers are simply science fiction.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/184814/hispanics-frown-trump-not-rest-gop-field.aspx
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-08-24/trump-s-net-favorable-rating-among-hispanics-at-51-gallup
Yet we;re supposed to believe Trump is getting a third of Latino voters against Hillary and more from blacks-who haven't gone beneath 80% for the Dems since the rise of the Southern strategy.
"Whoa! SurveyUSA has just come in with a national poll, conducted Sept. 2-3, showing Donald Trump leading Hillary Clinton 45 to 40 percent. Clearly even as Clinton's unfavorables are going up, Trump's are going down. The top line is not far out of line with national polls conducted between Aug. 11 and Aug. 30, which showed Trump with 41 to 45 percent and Clinton with 45 to 51 percent, but it is the first national poll showing Trump leading Clinton. But the biggest news in the SurveyUSA poll is its results for the "non-white" or "people of color" bloc that, in some psephologists' analyses, is fated to make the Democrats a permanent majority party"
"Against Trump Clinton carries non-whites — but by less than impressive margins. Trump's name is supposed to be mud among Hispanics, but he gets 31 percent of their votes — more than Mitt Romney in 2012, the same as John McCain in 2008 — and Clinton gets only a bare 50 percent. Among Asians, Trump actually has a (statistically insignificant) lead of 41 to 39 percent, echoing the 50 to 49 percent Asian margin for Republicans in the 2014 vote for House of Representatives. And among blacks Clinton leads Trump by 59 to 25 percent. That's a huge contrast with Barack Obama's margins of 95 to 4 percent in 2008 and 93 to 6 percent in 2012."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donald-trump-beats-hillary-clinton-in-poll-and-gets-25-percent-among-blacks/article/2571545
If you believe that she gets only 59% against Trump I got a bridge I want to sell you. Luckily I don't have to go far-Rush is already writing a check.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/09/08/why_the_republican_establishment_theory_on_trump_was_wrong
Listen-if Rush thinks Trump's going to give Hillary the spanking Kenneth Starr never could I'm all for it. By all means, let the entire base see this poll and conclude that Trump is doing great with minorities-so where's the worry.
P.S. Rush has now gone totally protectionist for Trump:
"With the Democrat Party, you don't really know. Then Richard Trumka is out there talking about how his organized labor guys love Trump. You know why they love Trump? 'Cause Trump's out there attacking trade deals. Trump's out there attacking the ChiComs and all these other people that are exporting to us. They're not importing anything from us. Trumka says that Trump's buds like it. "
Sounds like Trump's the man for the job.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/09/08/why_the_republican_establishment_theory_on_trump_was_wrong
Listen-if Rush thinks Trump's going to give Hillary the spanking Kenneth Starr never could I'm all for it. By all means, let the entire base see this poll and conclude that Trump is doing great with minorities-so where's the worry.
P.S. Rush has now gone totally protectionist for Trump:
"With the Democrat Party, you don't really know. Then Richard Trumka is out there talking about how his organized labor guys love Trump. You know why they love Trump? 'Cause Trump's out there attacking trade deals. Trump's out there attacking the ChiComs and all these other people that are exporting to us. They're not importing anything from us. Trumka says that Trump's buds like it. "
Sounds like Trump's the man for the job.
No comments:
Post a Comment