Pages

Monday, August 10, 2015

How is it That I'm Enjoying Howie Carr More than Lawrence O'Donnell Today?

     Talk about something being askew. I was listening to Lawrence last night and I'm a big fan but I really thought his show last night was kind of short-sighted.

      He wasted an awful lot of time criticizing Donald Trump and praising Megyn Kelly. I don't think Kelly deserves any praise.

     http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-racism-of-megyn-kelly.html

     On the other hand criticizing Trump is a waste of time and a squandering of opportunity.

      http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-interpersonal-sexism-of-trump-vs.html

     http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-sad-thing-is-trump-still-sounds.html

     Lawrence, you were always so strategic. Now you sound as clueless as commentators at Daily Kos or Firedoglake. Criticizing Trump is silly.

     1. It's too easy-it's just the lowest hanging fruit in the world. I mean we don't need you to rap Trump's knuckles so we realize that it's wrong to insult people 'even Rosie O'Donnell'-I mean that Trump's comments are absurd and wrong ought to go without saying. So why do you keep saying it?

     2. Liberals benefit from Trump. Again I shouldn't have to say this. How come Krugman, Paul Waldman, Warren Buffet, and Bill Clinton-who you worked for! I mean for God's Sake-know this without having to be told but you don't get it?

    http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/08/bill-clinton-republican-party-kingmaker.html

    I mean you used to think strategically. Who can forget how mad you would make the firebaggers at Firedoglake when you pointed out that Obama totally outwitted the GOP in the Great Debt Ceiling Chicken Debacle of 2011?

   O'Donnell did do one thing I could relate to. He revealed that he spent 3 hours last Friday listening to Rush Limbaugh and that he then listened to Howie Carr for the next 4 hours. I used to live in Massachusetts and listened to Howie Carr.

    What Howie said after the debate was pure music to my ears as it should be for any thinking Democrat-provided they aren't totally besotted with Bernie Sanders for some strange reason.

    "They didn’t lay a glove on him."

    "Donald Trump is still on top, and it became clearer each moment in last night’s debate that Juan Ellis Bush is running in the wrong party."

    "Could he have possibly used any more MSNBC dogwhistles? Immigration, Bush said, is a “wedge issue.” (That means, it’s a problem created by Democrats, for Democrats.) Trump is “divisive.” (That means he’s figured out the right wedge issues.) He said he stands by his statements that when illegal aliens, the “valedictorians” as he calls them, commit crimes, they are “acts of love.”

   "Just ask Kate Steinle’s family."

   "Bush twice said illegals should be “drivers” of economic recovery. Drivers? Do you ever read the newspapers, Juan? Any newspapers — New Hampshire, Florida, Massachusetts? One of our biggest problems is your valedictorians behind the wheel, usually drunk out of their minds."

   "This was one of the few times a televised event actually lived up to the hype. Two hours is a long time, too long to disguise your real character, not to mention politics.
  http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/howie_carr/2015/08/carr_trump_fends_off_pretenders_in_round_one

     I mean I couldn't write this any better. Howie is actually more effusively for Trump than Rush-who is at least trying to stay in the middle. He loves Trump and hates Jeb. Excellent. I feel the same way.

    http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/08/rush-limbaugh-on-know-nothing-movement.html

    So please, Lawruence, tell me you're in the Know-Nothing movement and don't just: know nothing. 

     P.S. The best news of all is that Roger Ailes and Trump have hugged it all out. Hannity had one of Trump's people on and praised Trump profusely.

    P.S.S. I said earlier that I've never seen a troll job like this in my life in a Presidential race. What makes it so great is that conservative Republicans just have no sense of context.

   So even though Rush noted that the 'liberal media' has been strangely uncritical of Trump he read nothing too much into it-this is because like all Republicans he hates context. Once a conservative
Republican believes something he's just never going to let you talk him out of it.

  I worry that folks like Lawrence ruin it with their un-strategic outbursts but it might actually be a good thing. Hopefully Rush watched Lawrence and said to himself 'But the communist O'Donnell is still against Trump. 

15 comments:

  1. Modre? Or More? (I Googled Howie Carr Modre... I got nothin')

    "Once a conservative
    Republican believes something he's just never going to let you talk him out of it."
    Openness to belief revision is a sign of weakness. (c:

    "Hopefully Rush watched Lawrence and said to himself 'But the communist O'Donnell is still against Trump" ... Ha, that's pretty funny.

    Mike, what's up with "infolinks" here... I get strange behavior when I visit your blog now (and yes, just your blog). That infolinks thing slowly rises from the bottom. I get pop ups. Certain words in the text are turned green with underlines and are no doubt automatically made hyperlinks to ads somewhere. But worst of all, when I cut and paste something (even into a comment, like I did above) it comes with a "Read more at [your URL]" attached at the end of the pasted text and I have to erase all that garbage every time.

    Also, the Smith Sadowski thing is going strong. It's moved to a new post now. Here's a highlights reel of the snarky bits (I'll let you figure out who wrote what):

    "Of course, if your goal is to be recognized as the world's leading advocate of time series derpometrics, be my guest."

    "You get an F for reading comprehension."

    "It's as if I quoted "Call me Ishmael" and you said I get an F for reading comprehension because the book is called "Moby Dick" so obviously there's no "Ishmael". See e.g. here."

    "Your reading comprehension could use a little work here ..."

    ---------------------------------

    OK Mike, enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I had a typo but I fixed it-before reading you comment, LOL Albeit right before. I meant 'more' not 'modre' So it's just Howie Carr.

      Infolinks is this advertising campaign I'm trying. That's not good if it gives you problems. I'm between a rock and a hard place on advertising.

      Google Adense dropped me in 2013 without a word of explanation. It later turned out that Adsense regularly dropped people when it was time to pay them.

      I tried Chitika which is not at all obtrusive the way you describe Infolinks but it also didn't pay any money at all. Infolinks-and Revenue HIts, the other ad platform I'm using-do actually pay a little.

      I don't want to make things unpleasant for readers but I want to make some money if I can. Once you understand how Infolinks works it's easy to go around.

      I did ask them if they could make the linked words at least a little more relevant. As for that thing at the bottom just click X and it's gone.

      Delete
    2. Not a biggie. I can live with infolinks, especially if they're paying you.

      Delete
  2. I have to hand it to Mark for "derpometrics" ... I Googled that, and nothing came back. Nothing at all. How rare is that?

    I'm thinking of stealing that for my own purposes. Perhaps I'll start a new blog: "Derpometrics." I feel like I had the "assist" on that one (if you scan the comments above).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well he is just embellishing the word 'derp.'You should have no problem finding 'derp'-Krugman has written about this extensively.

      Delete
    2. Oh yes, I know about derp (it's practically my middle name... actually I considered taking the name "Max Derp" for a few blog comments just for fun).

      Delete
    3. Well then derponetrics is just an embellishment of derp. It's Marks' coinage.

      Delete
    4. Yes, I know. I claim the inadvertent "assist" on that one because I think he was riffing off an earlier question I had for Jason about a hypothetical field I dubbed "physonometrics." I guess what surprised me is that nobody had coined "derpometrics" already. Seems like a natural. (and actually I have now posted at least twice as "derpometrician," lol).

      Delete
    5. I find calling myself "derp" kinda frees me up to ask really stupid questions. (c:

      So don't be surprised to occasionally see questions by "Derpometrician," "Derpius Maximus," or "DDerp (with two Ds for a double dose of derpin')."

      Delete
  3. In reality though Mark is oversimplifying. A conversation on such a complex plane by definition is not derp.

    ReplyDelete
  4. OK, score another snark point for Jason this time. I asked either of them if Mark's analysis was frequentist or Bayesian: Jason's response:

    "Tom, Mark's analysis is Bayesian where the prior probability of his model being right is equal to 1."

    ReplyDelete