He along is willing to fight back over this scam about emails. r
http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/08/19/on-msnbc-james-carville-calls-out-media-foolish/205029
He pointed out that we've seen this same media alarmism over these nothing burger scandals countless times in the years with the Clintons. I mean Begnhazi turns up nothing but the media doesn't register that and goes crazy about emails.
She has a server! A server!
Carville also had a great line: 'I know how you media folks think she doesn't deserve a defense.'
Which is true: when it comes to the Clintons it''s always that their guilty until proven innocent. We know the GOP wants to overturn the 14th amendment. Good luck with that.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/republicans-birthright-citizenship_55d4934be4b07addcb44c96a
On the Clintons the media agrees with the GOP that we should do away with due process and that someone is innocent until proven guilty.
Look, I admit it. I'm a partisan liberal Democrat. I love Hillary. I have always loved her and defended her right from the first time the media went haywire over something she said-when she said she's no Tammy Wynette.
There was outrage there, no one had ever said anything so offensive-to hear the GOP and the complicit media flaks.
You might think I'm saying the media is biased against her because I'm biased for her. I guess that's one of the effects of partisanship, even though partisans know a lot more about politics and what's really going on than the mushy middle types and the last minute voters that are so beloved by the Very Serious Media.
There's this urban legend that those who don't like to have strong opinions are somehow smarter or no more. Usually such undecideds don't know anything about what's going on.
But with the Clintons I've watched this for 23 years-as has been admitted they aren't covered like other politicians. I mean with all those bashing Hillary in the media there is literally no one defending her. After her press conference yesterday where I think she did pretty wells
http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/08/hillary-clinton-just-took-some.html
On tv yesterday evening, there was no one-even liberal MSNBC-who had anything positive to say about it. All you hear is 'Oh my goodness! She was so hostile. She was dismissive of these reasonable questions from Fox News. Democrats are panicking.'
What is amazing is that literally everyone in the beltway media had the same reaction. There wasn't anyone who said maybe she did ok. Not one.
This shows this for what it is. For the Beltway media, hostility to the Clintons and glee over phony scandals is a tribal marker that shows you're part of the club.
P.S. As she pointed out, none of her 400 donors asked about emails. Again, I think she did a good job. You have to realize there was nothing she could have said or done that would have pleased those hacks.
I would agree that she was smart to finally answer their foolish questions because this shows she's on top of it. She should do this a few more times. As much as the media flaks don't want to admit it, this was the start of defusing it.
P.S.S. The questions the news pundit asked Carville were so stupid. He sounded like a stupid high school kid trading on gossip. Because his tribe likes to pick on Hillary he was jumping in. He argued that emailgate is hurting her because she only has a 19 point lead against Bernie Sanders.
Yeah, right. With such brilliant electoral analysis I guess Nate Silver is getting worried.
http://mediamatters.org/video/2015/08/19/on-msnbc-james-carville-calls-out-media-foolish/205029
He pointed out that we've seen this same media alarmism over these nothing burger scandals countless times in the years with the Clintons. I mean Begnhazi turns up nothing but the media doesn't register that and goes crazy about emails.
She has a server! A server!
Carville also had a great line: 'I know how you media folks think she doesn't deserve a defense.'
Which is true: when it comes to the Clintons it''s always that their guilty until proven innocent. We know the GOP wants to overturn the 14th amendment. Good luck with that.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/republicans-birthright-citizenship_55d4934be4b07addcb44c96a
On the Clintons the media agrees with the GOP that we should do away with due process and that someone is innocent until proven guilty.
Look, I admit it. I'm a partisan liberal Democrat. I love Hillary. I have always loved her and defended her right from the first time the media went haywire over something she said-when she said she's no Tammy Wynette.
There was outrage there, no one had ever said anything so offensive-to hear the GOP and the complicit media flaks.
You might think I'm saying the media is biased against her because I'm biased for her. I guess that's one of the effects of partisanship, even though partisans know a lot more about politics and what's really going on than the mushy middle types and the last minute voters that are so beloved by the Very Serious Media.
There's this urban legend that those who don't like to have strong opinions are somehow smarter or no more. Usually such undecideds don't know anything about what's going on.
But with the Clintons I've watched this for 23 years-as has been admitted they aren't covered like other politicians. I mean with all those bashing Hillary in the media there is literally no one defending her. After her press conference yesterday where I think she did pretty wells
http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2015/08/hillary-clinton-just-took-some.html
On tv yesterday evening, there was no one-even liberal MSNBC-who had anything positive to say about it. All you hear is 'Oh my goodness! She was so hostile. She was dismissive of these reasonable questions from Fox News. Democrats are panicking.'
What is amazing is that literally everyone in the beltway media had the same reaction. There wasn't anyone who said maybe she did ok. Not one.
This shows this for what it is. For the Beltway media, hostility to the Clintons and glee over phony scandals is a tribal marker that shows you're part of the club.
P.S. As she pointed out, none of her 400 donors asked about emails. Again, I think she did a good job. You have to realize there was nothing she could have said or done that would have pleased those hacks.
I would agree that she was smart to finally answer their foolish questions because this shows she's on top of it. She should do this a few more times. As much as the media flaks don't want to admit it, this was the start of defusing it.
P.S.S. The questions the news pundit asked Carville were so stupid. He sounded like a stupid high school kid trading on gossip. Because his tribe likes to pick on Hillary he was jumping in. He argued that emailgate is hurting her because she only has a 19 point lead against Bernie Sanders.
Yeah, right. With such brilliant electoral analysis I guess Nate Silver is getting worried.
No comments:
Post a Comment