His attitude to the press is chilling when you consider that this man is one of two candidates remaining for POTUS. For those who think President Peter Thiel would be a disaster, just remember on press freedom there is very little daylight between the two: they both want it curbed.
Hillary called Trump out yesterday: this was a stunt by Trump and he only paid after being shamed by the media.
"Hillary Clinton dismissed her Republican opponent’s “stunt” to raise money for veterans in a Tuesday CNN interview, saying it proves “the difference between what Donald Trump says and what Donald Trump does.”
“He's bragged for months about raising $6 million for veterans and donating a million dollars himself,” Clinton told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “But it took a reporter to shame him into actually making his contribution and getting the money to veterans. So look, I'm glad he finally did but I don't know that he should get much credit for that.”
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/clinton-took-reporter-shame-trump-delivering-funds-veterans
Tom Brown pointed me to this Jennifer Rubin who argues that the real reason Trump is so miffed is that he had to actually cough up the money. There's probably a lot of truth in this-after all, despite all his talk there is no proof that he has done much charitable giving. His idea of giving seems to be to set up a private gulf course in your neighborhood.
"On reason he may have freaked out was that he was caught lying and using vets for his own political ends. Recall that he staged a veterans fundraiser on Jan. 28, widely interpreted as an excuse to get out of a moderated Fox News debate. He claimed to have raised $6 million but for months could not substantiate whether the money was actually given over. “More than a week ago, Trump’s campaign manager said that Trump had already given out his $1 million in personal gifts,” The Post reports. “As it turned out, he had not. Trump made his $1 million donation the evening of May 23, after a day of inquiries on Twitter — Trump’s preferred social-media platform — by The Washington Post.”
"The Associated Press reports: “Phone calls to all 41 of the groups by The Associated Press brought more than two-dozen responses Tuesday. About half reported checks from Trump within the past week, typically dated May 24, the day The Washington Post published a story questioning whether he had distributed all of the money.”
"If The Post had not caught Trump, would he ever have given the money? We won’t know, but we did learn (or re-learn) several things about Trump."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/06/01/what-trump-temper-tantrums-tell-us/
Sorry if this seems like a rush to judgment but I think I know the answer to that.
"For starters, we know that Trump will distort and out-and-out lie about his finances. It behooves the press and his opponents to continue to insist that he release tax returns. If they don’t succeed, it is up to the delegates at the Republican convention in July to force the issue."
Trump should be bashed over his tax returns every day until
1. He releases them
2. The election in November.
If it's 2, then this gives Dems and other Trump haters something to bash him over with until then.
Trump haters of the world unite!
"If the vet charity incident is any guide, the returns will show that things are not as Trump portrays them. Maybe, given that The Post was not bird-dogging him at the time, he did not give very much (anything?) in charity over the years. (We’ve noted other possibilities, including avoidance of any tax liabilities, or less income than advertised or disclosed to financial institutions and foreign entanglements.) It cannot be said too many times that the most unreliable indicator of Trump’s business record and finances is Trump. (The New York Times reports that a deal with Hong Kong money men portrayed as a big win for Trump was actually a losing proposition following prolonged litigation.)"
Smells like a brilliant dealmaker to me. Also a Master Persuader. His persuasive skills seem to often fail him in court like when he slurred the Trump U judge as a Mexican and this led to the records being unsealed.
"The next lesson is that Trump has a rotten poker face. When something gets under his skin — a press inquiry or an announcement of a potential third candidate — he attacks. And because he is so thin-skinned, many things and people get under his skin (e.g. British Prime Minister David Cameron, New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol, recalcitrant Republicans). He regularly attacks a lot of people. That should tell critics when they score a hit. Moreover, it should concern voters that in negotiations with far more at stake than a building, he would likely let his emotions get the best of him and reveal his weak points. We’ve already seen how mild criticism (from Cameron) or generic praise (Vladimir Putin) can dramatically affect his thinking. It is always all about him."
"Finally, what kind of billionaire promises to give money to vets and doesn’t?! I mean, really."
It can't be said enough: America faces an extinction like event. We are going to be tested as never before this time as our very system of government is on the ballot.
At this point I live by this adage: the enemy of Donald Trump is my friend. Scott Sumner, Jennifer Rubin, Glenn Beck.
If they are hitting Trump they have my respect. If they are doing something else, they don't.
Hillary called Trump out yesterday: this was a stunt by Trump and he only paid after being shamed by the media.
"Hillary Clinton dismissed her Republican opponent’s “stunt” to raise money for veterans in a Tuesday CNN interview, saying it proves “the difference between what Donald Trump says and what Donald Trump does.”
“He's bragged for months about raising $6 million for veterans and donating a million dollars himself,” Clinton told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “But it took a reporter to shame him into actually making his contribution and getting the money to veterans. So look, I'm glad he finally did but I don't know that he should get much credit for that.”
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/clinton-took-reporter-shame-trump-delivering-funds-veterans
Tom Brown pointed me to this Jennifer Rubin who argues that the real reason Trump is so miffed is that he had to actually cough up the money. There's probably a lot of truth in this-after all, despite all his talk there is no proof that he has done much charitable giving. His idea of giving seems to be to set up a private gulf course in your neighborhood.
"On reason he may have freaked out was that he was caught lying and using vets for his own political ends. Recall that he staged a veterans fundraiser on Jan. 28, widely interpreted as an excuse to get out of a moderated Fox News debate. He claimed to have raised $6 million but for months could not substantiate whether the money was actually given over. “More than a week ago, Trump’s campaign manager said that Trump had already given out his $1 million in personal gifts,” The Post reports. “As it turned out, he had not. Trump made his $1 million donation the evening of May 23, after a day of inquiries on Twitter — Trump’s preferred social-media platform — by The Washington Post.”
"The Associated Press reports: “Phone calls to all 41 of the groups by The Associated Press brought more than two-dozen responses Tuesday. About half reported checks from Trump within the past week, typically dated May 24, the day The Washington Post published a story questioning whether he had distributed all of the money.”
"If The Post had not caught Trump, would he ever have given the money? We won’t know, but we did learn (or re-learn) several things about Trump."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/06/01/what-trump-temper-tantrums-tell-us/
Sorry if this seems like a rush to judgment but I think I know the answer to that.
"For starters, we know that Trump will distort and out-and-out lie about his finances. It behooves the press and his opponents to continue to insist that he release tax returns. If they don’t succeed, it is up to the delegates at the Republican convention in July to force the issue."
Trump should be bashed over his tax returns every day until
1. He releases them
2. The election in November.
If it's 2, then this gives Dems and other Trump haters something to bash him over with until then.
Trump haters of the world unite!
"If the vet charity incident is any guide, the returns will show that things are not as Trump portrays them. Maybe, given that The Post was not bird-dogging him at the time, he did not give very much (anything?) in charity over the years. (We’ve noted other possibilities, including avoidance of any tax liabilities, or less income than advertised or disclosed to financial institutions and foreign entanglements.) It cannot be said too many times that the most unreliable indicator of Trump’s business record and finances is Trump. (The New York Times reports that a deal with Hong Kong money men portrayed as a big win for Trump was actually a losing proposition following prolonged litigation.)"
Smells like a brilliant dealmaker to me. Also a Master Persuader. His persuasive skills seem to often fail him in court like when he slurred the Trump U judge as a Mexican and this led to the records being unsealed.
"The next lesson is that Trump has a rotten poker face. When something gets under his skin — a press inquiry or an announcement of a potential third candidate — he attacks. And because he is so thin-skinned, many things and people get under his skin (e.g. British Prime Minister David Cameron, New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol, recalcitrant Republicans). He regularly attacks a lot of people. That should tell critics when they score a hit. Moreover, it should concern voters that in negotiations with far more at stake than a building, he would likely let his emotions get the best of him and reveal his weak points. We’ve already seen how mild criticism (from Cameron) or generic praise (Vladimir Putin) can dramatically affect his thinking. It is always all about him."
"Finally, what kind of billionaire promises to give money to vets and doesn’t?! I mean, really."
It can't be said enough: America faces an extinction like event. We are going to be tested as never before this time as our very system of government is on the ballot.
At this point I live by this adage: the enemy of Donald Trump is my friend. Scott Sumner, Jennifer Rubin, Glenn Beck.
If they are hitting Trump they have my respect. If they are doing something else, they don't.
Mike, Erick Erickson links to a devastating commercial against Trump (the one in which Trump's voice is overlaid on top of scenes of black patrons being ejected from dinners in the 1960s).
ReplyDeleteHe also brings up Trump University. Have you done a post on Trump U yet? There's some good stuff there:
http://theresurgent.com/the-scientology-like-scam-the-klansman-and-donald-trump/
Good job Erick Erickson. He is my friend as he's still anti Trump.
ReplyDeleteI have indeed discussed Trump U.
Among other things, it shows he's not the great dealmaker he's cracked up to be.
After all, that Trump U judge was very nice to him-too nice-in postponing the hearing until after the election. What chance do those people ripped off by Trump U have of winning the case if Trump is President?
Imagine him with all the power of the Presidency behind him?
But Trump repaid the judge by accusing him of being unfair and a Mexican.
Now the judge has unsealed the records. Doesn't sound like a good negotiator
http://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2016/05/trump-master-persuader-and-trump-u.html.
Trump yelled at the media yesterday that he's been vetting these organizations for months, and yet it takes such a short time to determine that one of those he gave money to last week is basically a scam. I'll hand the mic over to Leon Wolf:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/06/01/least-one-vet-charities-trump-donated-borderline-scam/
As Jonathan Chait says, Trump U was a scam just like the entire Trump campaign.
ReplyDeletehttp://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/06/trump-university-a-scam-just-like-trump-campaign.html?mid=twitter-share-di
Mike, the two videos here are funny:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.redstate.com/absentee/2016/06/01/video-great-shocking-hannity-revelation-nobody-saw-coming-except-everybody-everywhere/
(Sean <3's Donald)
And one on Bernie:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/06/01/bernie-hopes-use-california-victory-pretext-steal-nomination-clinton/
More on Trump U:
http://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/06/01/trump-university-instructed-recruiters-target-single-parents/
TK for you links Tom, which have inspired yet another post. It's official, I'm a Red State Democrat! LOL
ReplyDeletehttp://lastmenandovermen.blogspot.com/2016/06/its-official-i-am-now-erick-erickson.html
I suspect that no matter how much the right wing #NeverTrumpers say they despise Clinton, and that she's "just as bad" as Trump... deep down, they must know that Trump is far "worse" (from someone with their perspective).
ReplyDeleteLike P.J. O'Rourke has stated, he despises Hillary, and thinks she's wrong about everything... but she's wrong "within normal parameters." Trump isn't: he's a maniac. A man child. An extremely thin-skinned vindictive "whiny little bitch." Ignoring all the other damage someone like him could do, at a minimum he shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the launch codes to any nuclear weapons. Barry Goldwater would be 100x preferable in that regard.
... perhaps that's why there's an uptick in anti-Sanders posts today:
Deletehttp://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/06/01/bernie-sanders-lives-high-life-expensive-nba-seats/
Some like Ben Howe have admitted that NeverTrump means you vote for Hillary.
DeleteSaying NeverTrump and NeverHillary doesn't work as one of them will be President
Right, and O'Rourke also supports Hillary. And I'd argue he does so with just a tiny bit more honest enthusiasm that Maher displayed when endorsing Cruz over Trump in the primary:
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZRYfMa1wEk
And Rubin continue to pump out good articles today:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/06/01/republicans-cant-stop-excusing-the-inexcusable/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/06/01/why-clintons-foreign-policy-tactics-against-trump-will-work/
Art Deco (over at Sumner's) is an odd bird. He's clearly intelligent, well read, and has a good vocabulary, and is not prone to any of the conspiracy lunacy that E. Harding is sometimes attracted to (again today, Harding's been going off on how Obama is behind ISIS... I asked him what would convince him otherwise, and he said basically a record of every word the man has uttered in public or private since 2013... Lol... yeah, a nice "reasonable" null hypothesis he has there). But back to Art... it's hard to understand what he sees in Trump. You'd think Trump's vulgarity would turn him off if nothing else. He reminds me of one of those "refined" fascists you sometimes hear about from history. Like the villain from "Inglorious Bastards" only without the proven track record in sadistic slaughter.
And regarding Howe: he said he'd work an "I'm with her" phone bank if necessary.
Art sure doesn't like me though: he never misses an opportunity to lay into me! Lol
DeleteArt does take Harding (and others, even other Trump supports) to task though.
DeleteHere's Harding's reply to Art's reply to Harding:
Art: Unless you’re planning to deport problem blacks to the Congo, it makes no sense to discuss this problem coincident with a discussion of migration patterns.
Harding: Why not? Pointing to the diversity we’ve had since 1619 as a miniature version of the diversity we would have under open borders is not something I see a problem with.
http://www.themoneyillusion.com/?p=31749#comment-787228
Also, Art says he can see your point about Trump U.
Yeah, though we'll see what he says about my new link about Trump's old racist buddy Roy Cohn who used to have black servers-who he had sex with-and would call Sambo.
DeleteSee notice what Jennifer Rubin says: Hillary's tactics against Trump on foreign policy will work.
ReplyDeleteThat's what someone who wants Trump to lose sounds like.
I read a couple of David French authored anti-Trump pieces today at NR. Not bad!
ReplyDeleteE.g. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/435814/against-theres-chance-argument-donald-trump?target=author&tid=1048
DeleteLeon's on a roll today:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/06/01/trump-university-veterans-charities-willful-suspension-disbelief/
http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016/06/01/trump-campaign-releases-video-defending-trump-university...-scam/