Pages

Friday, July 10, 2015

Cullen Roche on Greece

      In my previous post I discussed some interesting convergences between Sumner and I and Greg and Morgan Warstler.

     

     Greg talked about Cullen Roche who thinks that the time for Grexit is passed. Greg agrees with him and Morgan here. There are a number of very smart economists who have the opposite view-Krugman, Lars Christensen, etc.

     Also, the MMT economist, Bill Mitchell.

     http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=31313

     Sure, a lot of this post was about the simple fact that Greece can leave the euro-as the Syrzia Administration has denied. Still, I think you can infer from the piece that he also doesn't think Grexit would be a terrible decision.

     Roche in one post denies that a Grexit would carry a lot of contagion.

     "There seems to be a bubble in the word “contagion”.  First up is Greece. This is a country that is equivalent to 0.3% of global output. And in the last 5 years their debt has been almost entirely shuffled onto the balance sheets of sovereigns. In addition, the ECB has created numerous programs that deal with banking crisis. If there was ever a debt crisis that the world was more prepared for then Greece is it. That doesn’t mean there are no risks from Grexit (like other countries exiting), but the actual economic impact from this is likely to be very minimal.  Especially outside of Europe. Will there be some contagion? Yes, but this is nothing like Lehman Brothers."

    http://www.pragcap.com/three-things-i-think-i-think-market-turmoil-edition

    Yes in the purely economic sense there isn't-but other countreis leaving the euro would be a political contagion for the euro itself. 
   
    If you see how the markets have rallied on the belief that there will be a Greece deal it's clear that not getting a deal could be very painful for Europe at least. 

    Though it's not the focus of this post, I'll throw in a little extra on Roche's view on China:

   "What about China. Isn’t their stock market crash going to crater the global economy? This one is a bigger worry in my view because the weakness in the Chinese economy is going to have a much bigger impact on Asia.  Then again, we have to maintain some perspective here. If the crash is going to significantly hurt global growth then shouldn’t the boom have been consistent with global growth?  The data clearly doesn’t show that at all."

    Well, it may not itself contribute to global growth but Chinese growth does and this is a worry to the extent that you believe stock markets are forward indicators that the economy is slowing down. This could be  a worry for global growth. 

    With Grexit he argues that Greece has no good options. 

    "There’s an economic battle occurring over whether Greece should leave the Euro or not. Economists on the left tend to say they should leave, bring back their old currency and go their own way. Economists on the right tend to say that Greece should stick it out and hang with the Euro.  I like to think I don’t generally find myself on a “side” and here’s a pretty good example of that."

   http://www.pragcap.com/hyperinflationary-lessons-for-greece

   I find that a bit grandiose-everyone is on a side is my premise. His desire it to be the reasonable extreme between the Right and the MMT Left with his Monetary Realism school. The whole point of my blog title is to send up the idea that anyone is truly 'not on  a side' like David Brooks does.

  He thinks that Grexit would have been the right move 5 years ago but now the cow has long since left the barn. 

  "5 years ago I said Greece should definitely leave the Euro.  My basic reasoning was that full integration is not going to happen and Greece will have to suffer through depressionary deflation in order to allow an internal rebalancing of their economy to occur. That view has turned out to be pretty spot on. Greece has undergone a modern day depression by any standard. And if they’d brought back the Drachma many years ago they could have avoided a lot of the deflation and depression."

   "This is no longer the situation we’re in. Greece has already undergone a substantial internal rebalancing. They’re one of the only Euro Area countries where wages have actually FALLEN in the last 5 years.  And they’ve fallen quite a bit in relative terms:"

  Now though, Roche argues Greece faces no good choice.

   "Now, the economists on the left say that Greece should leave because their new currency will make them so much more competitive. But I am not so sure that’s the right move at this point. The time to leave was before the depression set in. Not 5 years after it set in.  And the reason why is simple. At this point Greece faces no good options. Staying in the Euro is going to very likely involve low growth and further austerity. But the alternative looks perhaps more frightening at this point. And the alternative is a high inflation and perhaps even a hyperinflationary nightmare. In fact, if there was ever a recipe for hyperinflation then Greece meets all the criteria."


  •  The problem is multifaceted:
  • The Greek economy is too dependent on foreign exports.
  • The Euro will still be the dominant currency inside of Greece given that it’s largely a services and travel based economy. They will have, at best, a dual currency system.
  • Their tax system is defunct.
  • Their current budget promises will not be met via tax receipts.
  • Their bonds will not be in high demand in the near-term for obvious reasons.
   "All of this means that Greece will have to fund its spending by harnessing its central bank. And this means they could be on the verge of a hugely inflationary environment. They could offset some of this through harsh government policies including austerity and a balanced budget, but the whole point of this charade is that they don’t want more austerity. There’s a good chance that bringing back their own currency will not only result in austerity (by necessity), but it will also result in sky high inflation. In essence, they will have won nothing."

  Well, I think if nothing else, Cullen wins for the most pessimistic scenario.















6 comments:

  1. I do think leaving brings on more immediate financial risks, which seem to be the main concern of Greek people. Staying means less volatility but also less control over your own fate. I don't know what the majority of people will want, or even if the majority desire matters. The politicians and bankers will likely prefer less volatility.

    I think they missed their best opportunity to make the most of an exit, like Iceland did in 2008. That doesn't mean their aren't any upsides to leaving just that the upsides aren't quite as stark at the moment.

    "He who hesitates has lost"is a phrase that comes to mind.

    It is weird to agree, even if its only a little, with Morgan.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Greek people themselves are confused though as Bill Mitchell says. That's the problem. Syrzia was elected on this idea of staying in the euro but ending austerity which is mutually exclusive.

    http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=31021

    You can't blame this just on the politicians as the people elect them

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree completely. The idea of ending austerity and staying in the Euro was impossible but Im not sure every politician and economist who was in Greece grasped this.

    I think Cullen makes a very valuable point though, the Greeks have dropped their wages more than anyone else in the Eurozone and they still have not "benefitted". This should be held out to the monetarist/austrian austerity crowd as proof of ineffectiveness of their policy prescriptions. They have done all the "internal rebalancing" that anyone should ask of them, they have cut pension payments 40% for chrissakes. At this point, the only reason to leave the Euro is to be able to say "We are Greeks and we don't want to have Germans telling us how much our postmen get paid"...... which isn't a bad reason.... in fact its the main reason they should have left in the first place. We here in Ga don't get any say on how much California pays their workers.



    ReplyDelete
  4. I guess in fairness I didn't grasp it either totally until recently. I still don't get now why the EU was never willing to compromise but that's the reality.

    I don't know if you saw my post where I compared Tripas in January thinking the EU would work with him to Obama in January 2009 thinking the GOP would work with him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The difference being of course that Obama had a Democratic majority at the time so still was able to get a good amount done and has since realized the truth and uses his executive power liberally.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think the reason the EU was not willing to compromise is the monetary/economic ignorance of most people to tell you the truth.

    Since there is no fiscal body for all of Europe all there is is the ECB to act counter cyclically. Its a monetarists dream. The ECB is all powerful and essentially acts as the fiscal body. Unfortunately when the ECB acts to purchase bonds with QE the average Europen thinks it is "spending" and therefore depriving the Euro zone of money elsewhere. Germans actually believe they are personally paying for aid to Greece when the ECB considers Greek bond buying. They all are using this zero sum logic and its terribly destructive. Any "help" given to Greece is viewed by the rest of Europe as raising their taxes because they have to pay for Greece...... its total BS.

    The leaders of Europe and the Troika do nothing to combat this mindset either, in fact most probably think the same way. Its insanity

    ReplyDelete