Pages

Friday, October 14, 2011

Despite All the Hype Obama Continues to Lead

http://news.yahoo.com/time-poll-obama-still-ahead-gop-rivals-voters-081010901.html

    As much as the boobirds take any temporary drop in Obama's numbers as proof he is in deep trouble he continues to lead all GOP challengers. He leads Romney 46-43 percent among likely voters. He leads Perry 50-38 and the currently surging Herman Cain 49-37.

    He also is doing very well with women with a 49-41 lead among them against Perry, 53-36 against Perry and 53-32 against Cain.

    While the naysayers belabor his 44 percent approval rating, the large majorities that are concerned about the direction the country is going in and the economy, what they always ignore is Obama is personally liked by the public. I've pointed this out to FDLers who scoffed that this could be relevant but what they fail to consider is how close likability is to trust or at least think of it this way: if you like someone you probably have a decent level of trust for him or at least think his heart is in the right place.

   The numbers clearly show why the Republican party establishment quite desperately prefers Romney, he is clearly the only one who has a prayer of winning. Yet he still hasn't put the primary race away. This is the latest the GOP has been open since Wendell Willkie. Normally the party would know who it's candidate is by now. Yet the establishment is struggling. Cain is currently leading the field yet he is trails Obama by the most. Rush Limbaugh attacked Romney this week as not a conservative-about as damning as it gets- pointing out that 70 percent of the GOP field is not interested in Romney.

   In addition there was some good news from this Time poll regarding issues. On most issues the public agrees with the Democrats.

   "For Democrats, the silver lining in a gloomy series of electoral rebukes and legislative setbacks is that voters remain partial to their chief economic principles, at least compared to the alternatives. Forty-two percent of respondents say they place greater trust in the Democratic Party to deal with the nation's problems, compared to the 31% who side with Republicans. In particular, some two-thirds of those surveyed say they prefer the Democrats' blueprint for trimming the federal deficit — a mix of spending cuts and tax hikes — to the GOP prescription, which would solely slash spending. At the same time, more voters think reducing spending is a better way to juice the moribund economy than an additional round of stimulus, the approach advocated by liberal economists."

   That last line about preferring reducing spending to increasing stimulus however is the one thing the GOP can jump all over. If this is what the public believes it is wrong. There is no way cutting spending could juice the economy. A majority also thought that Saddam Hussein was connected to 9/11.

    Meanwhile the Occupy Wall Street protests are seen much more positively than the Tea Party movement is: "The survey also revealed that respondents have a better impression of the left-leaning protest movement known as Occupy Wall Street than they do of the Tea Party movement. Fifty-four percent of respondents harbor a positive view of the burgeoning protest movement, well above the 23% with a negative opinion. By contrast, just 27% of those surveyed have favorable views of the Tea Party, while 65% say its impact on U.S. politics since its inception in 2009 has been negative or negligible."

     "Those results reflect a strain of economic populism common to the new movement's backers. Among those respondents familiar with Occupy Wall Street, nearly 80% argue the wealth disparity in the U.S. has grown too large and 68% say the rich should pay more taxes. Even so, this cohort is aware of the challenges facing the movement. Fifty-six percent predict Occupy Wall Street will have little impact on American politics, and another 9% say its effect will be negative."

    So Americans support OWS though are pessimistic about its chances of success.

  

2 comments:

  1. To say that "Normally the party would know who it's candidate is by now." shows you to be clueless. At this point in the race last time around it looked like it was going to be Hillary Clinton vs. Rudy Giuliani.

    LOL... cashed any bogus checks recently?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Historically they usually know by now. This is not an opinion Chicken Little it's a historical fact. Every Republican strategist admits the GOP field is in worse than it's been in years. So you are the one who is clueless.

    Your carping on my falling a victim of a scam says a lot about you. I was willing to admit it because I dont have any vanity.

    I know I'm a smart guy, everyone has been scammed in some way in their life. You have been too I'm sure starting with who gave you the name ChickenHammer.

    ReplyDelete