He does in policy ideas what she does in gymnastics as Krugman points out this morning.
"As of this morning, as I understand it, Romney has announced that he would guarantee coverage; walked that back; walked back the walkback; and it seems, walked back the walkback of the walkback."
"All of which reflects the fact that he’s got nothing."
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/10/health-care-gymnastics/
It truly is impressive. Indeed, watching Romney's whole interview with David Gregory, shows us why they so seldom let Romney wonder out of the Fox News bubble.
In the interview he claimed he'd somehow keep the provision protecting those with preexiting conditions-but later his aide told NR this meant that the market would protect them which bets the question why it hasn't until now.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/mitt-romney-obamacare-preexisting-condition.php?ref=fpa
His policy gymnastics were not only on healthcare but taxes. He now claims that he doesn't plan to cut taxes on the rich. Yes, he plans to reduce their tax rate by 20% but this will be offset by some magical loopholes that he won't divulge until after the election.
This has become the Romney-Ryan stock answer to every policy issue: We'll tell you after you elect us.
"Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney and his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), stressed in interviews on Sunday that they would offset tax cuts for the wealthy by closing tax loopholes. But pressed on which loopholes they would close, both of them dodged the question."
"We think the secret to economic growth is lower tax rates for families and successful small businesses by plugging loopholes," Ryan told George Stephanopoulos on ABC's "This Week." "Now the question is not necessarily what loopholes go, but who gets them. High income earners use most of the loopholes. That means they can shelter their income from taxation."
"When Stephanopoulos asked him why he has refused to be more specific about which loopholes he would plug, Ryan suggested that it's because he and Romney don't yet know. "George, because we want to have this debate in the public," he said. "We want to have this debate with Congress. And we want to do this with the consent of the elected representatives of the people and figure out what loopholes should stay or go and who should or should not get them."
"Meanwhile, host David Gregory tried to get some specifics out of Romney in an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press." "Give me an example of a loophole you would close," Gregory said, after trying and failing several times to coax the candidate into giving specifics.
Romney couldn't give one. "Well, I can tell you that people at the high end, high income taxpayers, are going to have fewer deductions and exemptions," he said. "Those numbers are going to come down. Otherwise they'd get a tax break. And I want to make sure people understand, despite what the Democrats said at their convention, I am not reducing taxes on high income taxpayers."
"Romney has faced criticism for avoiding listing the specifics of his economic plan, including which tax deductions he'd cut, which he has said is part of his political strategy. The Democrats "would love to have me specify one or two so they could amass the special interest to fight that effort," he told Time magazine in August."
"He has been more specific about his budget in private talks with donors, announcing at a fundraiser in April he would "eliminate the second-home mortgage interest deduction" as well as deductions for state income and property taxes. But those deductions would only put a $40 billion-per-year dent in the $400 billion worth of tax cuts per year that Romney has proposed, according to The New York Times.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/09/mitt-romney-paul-ryan-tax-loopholes_n_1868444.html
Ryan wants to have this debate "in public" alright-after the election. If he really did it wouldn't be hard to have just tell us what loopholes you have in mind. Otherwise we'll have to assume it's like Krugman says-you have nothing.
It's certainly heartening to hear that Romney levels with his wealthy donors but not the public.
Again, we have to admire the talent of Multiple Choice Mitt go get on both sides of every issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment